Sonoma University / Electromagnetic Weapons

[gerryduffett]

Sonoma University

Electromagnetic Weapons

Radiowaves As Weapons

This report makes references to the U.S. Intelligence Community or the U.S. Government.

I don't think thats the "big" problem.

Looks like this is some type of "worldwide" problem.

I am now researching laws in Canada.

"Project Censored"

Microwave Weapons

Electronic Harassment

A Study of the History of US Intelligence Community Human Rights Violations and Continuing Research in "Electromagnetic Weapons."

Located here :

www.projectcensored.org

www.projectcensored.org/newsflash/ElectromegnaticWeapons.pdf

"Print out" .pdf file

Completed December 2006

Sonoma State University

Project Censored

Media Freedom Foundation

Peter Philips

Lew Brown

Bridget Thorton

--------------------------

Gerry Duffett

14-4218 Lawrence Ave E Box 218
Scarborough Ontario
Canada M1E4X9

[e-mail]
[e-mail]

gerryduffett.proboards54.com/index.cgi?board=general

www.goliathboards.com/users5/gerryduffett/index.cgi

[gerryduffett]

Here is an disturbing video.

Directed Energy Weapons
Electronic Harassment
Deadly Electronic Weapons
Microwave Harassment

Located here :

video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4515534125267138757

-----------------------------

All news to me.

Gerry Duffett

14-4218 Lawrence Ave E Box 218
Scarborough Ontario
Canada M1E4X9

[e-mail]

[e-mail]

www.goliathboards.com/users5/gerryduffett/index.cgi

[gerryduffett]

Laws / Electromagnetic Weapons

Who's talking about "TASERS"

These are not "TASERS" !!!

Electronic and Electromagnetic Devices
Directed Energy Weapon's
Deadly Electronic Weapons.
Microwave Harassment.
Pulse Modulated Microwave Weapons

-------------------------------

MAINE LAW

Title 17-A: Maine Criminal Code.
Part 2: Substantive offenses.
Chapter 41: Criminal use of explosives and related crimes.
1004. Criminal use of electronic weapon.

janus.state.me.us/legis/statutes/17-a/title17-asec1004.html

2. As used in this section, "electronic weapon" means a portable device or weapon from which an electrical current, impulse, wave or beam may be directed, which current, impulse, wave or beam is designed to have a disabling effect upon human beings.

"CURRENT" is "TASER"

What is "IMPULSE, WAVE or BEAM"

------------------------------

MASSACHUSETTS LAW

Chapter 170 Of The Acts of 2004

www.mass.gov/legis/laws/seslaw04/sl040170.htm

Section 131J. No person shall possess a portable
device or weapon from which an electrical current,
impulse, wave or beam may be directed, which current,
impulse, wave or beam is designed to incapacitate
temporarily, injure or kill.

"CURRENT" is "TASER".

What is "IMPULSE, WAVE or BEAM" ?

-----------------------------

MICHIGAN STATE LAW / 2003-0256

www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(ni3g0l45u2h3gtimttam0g55))/mileg.aspx?page=home

(k) "Harmful electronic or electromagnetic device"
means a device designed to emit or radiate or that, as
a result of its design, emits or radiates an
electronic or electromagnetic pulse, current, beam,
signal, or microwave that is intended to cause harm to
others or cause damage to, destroy, or disrupt any
electronic or telecommunications system or device,
including, but not limited to, a computer, computer
network, or computer system.

"CURRENT" is "TASER".

What is "EMIT, RADIATE, ELECTRONIC, ELECTROMAGNETIC,
PULSE, BEAM, SIGNAL or MICROWAVE" ?

------------------------------

That's 3 states, Michigan, Massachusetts and Maine in the United States that acknowledge the existence of "Deadly Electronic Weapons"

I am now trying to find laws for Canada.

These exsist on the steet

Scary stuff !!!

------------------------------

Gerry Duffett

14-4218 Lawrence Ave E Box 218
Scarborough Ontario
Canada M1E4X9

[e-mail]
[e-mail]

www.goliathboards.com/users5/gerryduffett/index.cgi

[lurk]

But let's talk about what you're really suggesting.

You're putting forward the theory we hear on some conspiracy sites, that because the military is experimenting with beam weaponry, these weapons exist in a portable and easily accessible shape. More importantly the suggestion is these weapons are being used by secret government agencies to target individuals surreptitiously for unknown reasons. These weapons tend to have the affect of causing their targets to doubt their sanity.

Could this happen? I don't know, but another theory put forward suggests the people who have identified themselves as targets of this technology may be experiencing psychological problems. Which is more likely?

First of all let's look at what the existing technology actually looks like.

Portable Military Beam Weapon

[sasquatch]

During the last stages of the Cold War, the Soviets covertly bombarded the US Embassy in Moscow with massive micro-wave radiation in an effort to jam clandestine communications. It apparently caused psychological difficulties with those within the embassy. The equipment used was not portable in the conventional sense.

[lurk]

sasquatch said:

During the last stages of the Cold War, the Soviets covertly bombarded the US Embassy in Moscow with massive micro-wave radiation in an effort to jam clandestine communications. It apparently caused psychological difficulties with those within the embassy. The equipment used was not portable in the conventional sense.

I'm gonna call you on this one. Give me a link.

[sasquatch]

Do your own internet research.

That was nearly 20 years back.....original information....any one who had been in that building was subject to thorough med exams. MRI's were fairly new at the time.

[Deleted]

...sounds like you guys have your " FLUX CAPACITATORS " aimed at each other ..... ;D

[lurk]

sasquatch said:

Do your own internet research.

Uhmm...no thanks. I've done my time researching urban legends on conspiracy sites based on some strange sounding claim I heard on a message board.

Without touching Google I can pretty much tell you what I'll find. There won't be anything on anything like a reputable site but there will be pages of conspiracy sites where they quote some out of context blurb from a newpaper article. It's usually the same blurb on every site. Often they can find some professor, or specialist who's probably as nutty as they are to support their claims. Quite often you'll find reference to one of those hypumentaries the BBC is famous for.

Translate all this, and what it adds up to is urban legend.

But hey...you made the claim. Feel free to prove me wrong. I'll go make myself a tinfoil hat.

[sasquatch]

Well you could consult the:

National Security Agency
Fort Meade
Maryland

Tell me punk do you feel lucky?

[lurk]

Cool, thanks. Maybe I'll ask them about the grassy knoll too, or if an Israeli missile hit the White House on 9/11, or maybe they can tell me about Timothy McVeigh's Al Quaida connections.

Wouldn't it be easier just to post a reputable, verifiable link when you're posting a story of questionable details?