“gang stalking” or community policing?

[tag]

“gang stalking” or community policing?


Could the guy that did the most recent school shootings have been a victim of “gang stalking” or community policing?

He did mention trying to get out, or away, but it sounded like 'they" (the gang stalkers) may have had him programmed real good. Over sensitized.

Most of this is apparently being done with police knowledge and police protection, for the people doing the harassing.
Some people have even committed suicide because of this tactic.
I took this from www.gangstalking.ca/advice.htm
There are lots of good sights about this.

What I am asking is, is it possible, nothing else, just is it possible this could have been the cause of him breaking.

SENSITIZATION

Be careful of assuming that people are perpetrators. Familiarize yourself with the concept of "sensitization" because this is how you are behaviorally conditioned to respond to the perpetrators.

There are activites that are designed specifically to let you know that someone is a perpetrator. They will do this intentionally in order for you to know that you are being stalked. For example, let's say that for a period of time you saw people with compasses everywhere, and then it stopped. It is very unlikely that this is just a coincidence because virtually no portion of the population carries compasses with them and uses them randomly in public (Note: you are not in a campground or at a Scout meeting when this happens). So when you see someone using a compass, it is to communicate a non-verbal message that you are being stalked.

Similarly, someone who gives me the finger when I am on foot is 99.9% likely to be a perpetrator, since I am not doing any behaviors that would cause someone to give me the finger, such as driving aggressively or even looking disapprovingly at someone (that's stretching it a bit, but just to illustrate that it is not a "provoked" finger).

Sensitization has a domino-like effect. The perpetrators only have to push the first domino down because the rest will fall by themselves. These people are capitalizing on human psychology. Once you are made aware that you are being stalked, the tactics can become more subtle and can even become indistinguishable from normal, everyday occurrences. Chances are that you will lose perspective on what is "normal" after a while and begin to react to things that are no longer perp-related. Here is an example.

For a period of time, perhaps 1 month, they send many perpetrators around you with laptops. They do some obvious things like stare at you for very long periods of time, or smile mockingly to get your attention, or even do bizarre hand movements - something out of the ordinary to grab your attention. As a result of this "blitz" campaign, the laptops then become associated with perpetrators in your mind. This is the intention of the perpetrators. You are now "sensitized". (Or the first domino has been pushed down by the perpetrators).

After this, they can reduce the number of people around you who are carrying laptops and acting bizarrely to the point where they may stop altogether. This is because now you ASSUME that anyone carrying a laptop is a perpetrator. (The rest of the dominos fall by themselves). The problem is that a certain part of the population naturally carries laptops with them. However, if they have conditioned you so well that you lose track of what is "normal", you are going to feel stressed everytime you see a stranger with a laptop. The more laptops you see, the higher your anxiety (and anger) will climb. If you are very stressed, then they can have the added benefit of watching you attack someone carrying a laptop, and maybe even get you charged with assault. In the end, it doesn't matter if that person is a perpetrator or not - you have been conditioned to think he is.

This applies to any kind of conditioning. It could be white vans that they condition you to. It could be red t-shirts that they sensitize you to. It doesn't matter because once you are sensitized, YOU will be your own worst enemy.

We have to be constantly vigilant to remember what is "normal", and not assume that every white van, or every person in a red t-shirt is a perpetrator. We have to resist becoming sensitized. If you can say to yourself, "This may not be a perpetrator - I can't make that assumption," then it forces the perpetrators to show their hand very blatantly in order to get your attention. This means that they risk exposure. But if you react to the smallest thing, then the sensitization has gotten the better of you and the perpetrators have won. It is possible to resist becoming sensitized, so don't give up trying.

This is just a thought but man it would make a geat conspiracy theory or movie. Has a ny one any information on how these people know when to stop?
Pushing the buttons of someone that is even a little paranoid to begin with, is a dangerous business, especaly if the team doing it has been pumped up and overly gung ho.
The police would need to be heavely involved for these people to get away with it.
And the police would probably have to give the names and adresses of the people they want harassed or moniterd.
It would take only one of these people to come forward, to force a goverment investigation, into police involvement.

[concerned1refcaine]

tag said:

“gang stalking” or community policing?


Could the guy that did the most recent school shootings have been a victim of “gang stalking” or community policing?

He did mention trying to get out, or away, but it sounded like 'they" (the gang stalkers) may have had him programmed real good. Over sensitized.

Most of this is apparently being done with police knowledge and police protection, for the people doing the harassing.
Some people have even committed suicide because of this tactic.
I took this from www.gangstalking.ca/advice.htm
There are lots of good sights about this.

What I am asking is, is it possible, nothing else, just is it possible this could have been the cause of him breaking.

SENSITIZATION

Be careful of assuming that people are perpetrators. Familiarize yourself with the concept of "sensitization" because this is how you are behaviorally conditioned to respond to the perpetrators.

There are activites that are designed specifically to let you know that someone is a perpetrator. They will do this intentionally in order for you to know that you are being stalked. For example, let's say that for a period of time you saw people with compasses everywhere, and then it stopped. It is very unlikely that this is just a coincidence because virtually no portion of the population carries compasses with them and uses them randomly in public (Note: you are not in a campground or at a Scout meeting when this happens). So when you see someone using a compass, it is to communicate a non-verbal message that you are being stalked.

Similarly, someone who gives me the finger when I am on foot is 99.9% likely to be a perpetrator, since I am not doing any behaviors that would cause someone to give me the finger, such as driving aggressively or even looking disapprovingly at someone (that's stretching it a bit, but just to illustrate that it is not a "provoked" finger).

Sensitization has a domino-like effect. The perpetrators only have to push the first domino down because the rest will fall by themselves. These people are capitalizing on human psychology. Once you are made aware that you are being stalked, the tactics can become more subtle and can even become indistinguishable from normal, everyday occurrences. Chances are that you will lose perspective on what is "normal" after a while and begin to react to things that are no longer perp-related. Here is an example.

For a period of time, perhaps 1 month, they send many perpetrators around you with laptops. They do some obvious things like stare at you for very long periods of time, or smile mockingly to get your attention, or even do bizarre hand movements - something out of the ordinary to grab your attention. As a result of this "blitz" campaign, the laptops then become associated with perpetrators in your mind. This is the intention of the perpetrators. You are now "sensitized". (Or the first domino has been pushed down by the perpetrators).

After this, they can reduce the number of people around you who are carrying laptops and acting bizarrely to the point where they may stop altogether. This is because now you ASSUME that anyone carrying a laptop is a perpetrator. (The rest of the dominos fall by themselves). The problem is that a certain part of the population naturally carries laptops with them. However, if they have conditioned you so well that you lose track of what is "normal", you are going to feel stressed everytime you see a stranger with a laptop. The more laptops you see, the higher your anxiety (and anger) will climb. If you are very stressed, then they can have the added benefit of watching you attack someone carrying a laptop, and maybe even get you charged with assault. In the end, it doesn't matter if that person is a perpetrator or not - you have been conditioned to think he is.

This applies to any kind of conditioning. It could be white vans that they condition you to. It could be red t-shirts that they sensitize you to. It doesn't matter because once you are sensitized, YOU will be your own worst enemy.

We have to be constantly vigilant to remember what is "normal", and not assume that every white van, or every person in a red t-shirt is a perpetrator. We have to resist becoming sensitized. If you can say to yourself, "This may not be a perpetrator - I can't make that assumption," then it forces the perpetrators to show their hand very blatantly in order to get your attention. This means that they risk exposure. But if you react to the smallest thing, then the sensitization has gotten the better of you and the perpetrators have won. It is possible to resist becoming sensitized, so don't give up trying.

This is just a thought but man it would make a geat conspiracy theory or movie. Has a ny one any information on how these people know when to stop?
Pushing the buttons of someone that is even a little paranoid to begin with, is a dangerous business, especaly if the team doing it has been pumped up and overly gung ho.
The police would need to be heavely involved for these people to get away with it.
And the police would probably have to give the names and adresses of the people they want harassed or moniterd.
It would take only one of these people to come forward, to force a goverment investigation, into police involvement.

Yesss Tag I agree, all your assessments are very correct about the perpetrators. I think they exactly know what they are doing but simply care very little about the results of "making a schoolhouse monster" or "monster in the family".

Those "Team Perpetrators" are in all areas of the "Click And Clack Elite" in every town large and small, village and city of Canada......just as often or not, their parents and friends hobnobb around with very VIP politicians in large or small ponds of political circles, yet they are considered "bigwigs" and pillars of the communities.

The young man that went into Dawson College in Montreal, I would say is an end result of of perpetator team bullying in all aspects of Modern Canadian Life, in many ways that young man reflects a "darker myself". Oh I have had my problems but I don't think I will go off on that deep end just that way.

What I get as very interesting is the attitude of those students of Dawson College, shocked about what that young man did, yet still wondering why he actually did it and not even thinking that it was a person disenfranchised because of the very system they are getting an education in and disenfranchised the young man whom had no future in this education system beyond deadend jobs while these people probably had "glowing futures".

Are we at such great times in our era that we think that the education system is the end all and be all that we upraise and put on a pedistal. We even glorify it, we let most peoples get educated but create disenfranchising groups that do nothing more but create their own agrandtisments and disenfranchise others and keeping people on the fringe of the herd then demeaning them because they are on the outside of the herd?

If this is the case then I think we all need to re-examine the whole education system and retune it or in the future we can expect many worse Dawson College incidents in Canada and the United States.