Allowing citizens to bear arms eliminates crime!
Feb 5, 2009 21:58:35 GMT -5
Post by proudtobeadp on Feb 5, 2009 21:58:35 GMT -5
Like it or not Canadians studies by well trained professional statisticians studying of all countries, gulp! the USA shows without question that the right to bear arms as competent and arms licenced and trained citizens greatly and massively eliminates crime. Statistics just don't lie! Shades of police pink slips and layoffs as a result of law abiding citizens actually taking care of themselves!
Manitoba that has a population less than 10 percent of the State of Florida (USA) when it comes to car theft has a similar statistical number of car thefts Florida does! ! Why? Because in Florida stealing some one's car being some one's property will get you shot and perhaps killed is the deterent. Yet people get on with their lives as all normal people do every day no different than we do in Canada yet! Like it or not we are of the same melting pot origins. In almost every catagory of property and personal crime the right to bear arms in the case of citizens licenced to carry and use a concealed weapon is a massively huge deterent to crime as it is those that make easy marks as a result only deteriorating neighbourhoods are the only ones left who can not afford arms therefore are the only ones left who criminals can pick on as easy pickings anymore. Then really, a baseball bat with the top studded with inch long hammered in nails here is also great medicine as fighting back with anything for a weapon is better than nothing whe facing a criminal with a gun. Statistically doing nothing and being passive with criminals who already have their guns net more harm to those passive people where the outraged and agressive people accosted by criminals are hard pickings criminals don't want face either so they look for the meek passive and easy marks elsewhere.
Statistics don't lie but governments do and their lackeys do. Canadas gun control laws cost billions of dollars but only prevented 1 single murder from available statistics. It did employ hundreds of beholden bureacrats and pork barreled millions of dollars in computer hardware and software for some kind of campaign contribution for some one's future election or re-election though in some higher bureacrats ever enlarging empire building scheme that actually made a mess of what only micro-mamged by the incompetent bureacrats could make a mess of.
When one hears the media spin doctors and police officers of the Winnipeg Police Service and other Canadian police services bad mouthing a neighboring country, the USA where licenced armed citizens stick up for their rights smacks of police officers who like crime, want all Winnipeg citizens as their police employment feed stocks, like their para military elitist jobs with their perks, tons of overtime and payoff payolas (unaddressed white collar crime) more than the citizens / taxpayers / ratepayers, the people of Winnipeg they are really supposed to serve and protect.
What is even more convincing is that police admit freely that they as police are reactive. Reactive means that they only respond once a crime has been identified by a citizen or citizens identifying crimes to them which means their prescence as a police force is somewhat a deterence globally but when a crime is committed anyway and their passive changed to reactive didn't mean a thing where a armed citizen protecting his or her own rights then and their would have been an active and primary deterent criminals intent on crime do not want to meet up with. Police have their part but able citizens always must play their own self protective part by making sure others even the police obey Canada's laws. If that is not the case and crime is rampant then a change is required and it is not the deprivation of citizens of their rights to exist unmolested by any criminal by any dress of clothes.
There is a saying in Winnipeg. Winnipeg is where police are police but their police dogs are always nervous! Its only a joke, isn't it?
Manitoba that has a population less than 10 percent of the State of Florida (USA) when it comes to car theft has a similar statistical number of car thefts Florida does! ! Why? Because in Florida stealing some one's car being some one's property will get you shot and perhaps killed is the deterent. Yet people get on with their lives as all normal people do every day no different than we do in Canada yet! Like it or not we are of the same melting pot origins. In almost every catagory of property and personal crime the right to bear arms in the case of citizens licenced to carry and use a concealed weapon is a massively huge deterent to crime as it is those that make easy marks as a result only deteriorating neighbourhoods are the only ones left who can not afford arms therefore are the only ones left who criminals can pick on as easy pickings anymore. Then really, a baseball bat with the top studded with inch long hammered in nails here is also great medicine as fighting back with anything for a weapon is better than nothing whe facing a criminal with a gun. Statistically doing nothing and being passive with criminals who already have their guns net more harm to those passive people where the outraged and agressive people accosted by criminals are hard pickings criminals don't want face either so they look for the meek passive and easy marks elsewhere.
Statistics don't lie but governments do and their lackeys do. Canadas gun control laws cost billions of dollars but only prevented 1 single murder from available statistics. It did employ hundreds of beholden bureacrats and pork barreled millions of dollars in computer hardware and software for some kind of campaign contribution for some one's future election or re-election though in some higher bureacrats ever enlarging empire building scheme that actually made a mess of what only micro-mamged by the incompetent bureacrats could make a mess of.
When one hears the media spin doctors and police officers of the Winnipeg Police Service and other Canadian police services bad mouthing a neighboring country, the USA where licenced armed citizens stick up for their rights smacks of police officers who like crime, want all Winnipeg citizens as their police employment feed stocks, like their para military elitist jobs with their perks, tons of overtime and payoff payolas (unaddressed white collar crime) more than the citizens / taxpayers / ratepayers, the people of Winnipeg they are really supposed to serve and protect.
What is even more convincing is that police admit freely that they as police are reactive. Reactive means that they only respond once a crime has been identified by a citizen or citizens identifying crimes to them which means their prescence as a police force is somewhat a deterence globally but when a crime is committed anyway and their passive changed to reactive didn't mean a thing where a armed citizen protecting his or her own rights then and their would have been an active and primary deterent criminals intent on crime do not want to meet up with. Police have their part but able citizens always must play their own self protective part by making sure others even the police obey Canada's laws. If that is not the case and crime is rampant then a change is required and it is not the deprivation of citizens of their rights to exist unmolested by any criminal by any dress of clothes.
There is a saying in Winnipeg. Winnipeg is where police are police but their police dogs are always nervous! Its only a joke, isn't it?
We are going to just have to agree to disagree.
