|
|
Post by sasquatch on Apr 23, 2007 12:11:06 GMT -5
Sorta funny that mouth swabs are used to sample DNA. Epithelial cells have DNA and in that virus infect cells---bingo. Go spew YOUR BS elsewhere----BAKKA.....  |
|
|
|
Post by sasquatch on Apr 23, 2007 12:21:57 GMT -5
The above is a work of fiction which will not win ANY awards. The main tactic of deceivers is to play on the ignorance of the reader. The gun-grabbers love to put about that prior to C68 there was no gun control. The above could only be true is you are indeed an extremely venerable citizen. Legistlation passed in 1934 restricted ownership of certain firearms.... "Any firearms designed to or adapted to fire from an overall length of 271/2 inches, with a barrel length less than 18 inches or capable of firing more than one cartridge with a single pressure of the trigger." Travel/conveyance permits were required which did not apply to fully auto firearms. |
|
|
|
Post by sasquatch on Apr 23, 2007 17:14:29 GMT -5
Actually careful reading of you post implied that: 1. You were knowledgable/authority because of this alleged membership in this mythical 'gun-club". 2.That in your capacity as a self-appointed expert this was legal in the recent past. Once again hysterical opinion based upon  Your recent posts nominated you as the Biggest BULL SHOOTER on this site. Some folks collect stamps...... I greatly doubt an "Attorney General Approved Firearms range" would: 1. Allow such an obviously unauthorized device. These clubs have always been very careful to meticulously abide by the rules/laws in order to retain their designation. 2. Allow a Thompson to be fired on their indoor range----most indoor ranges steel backstops would be damaged by 45 ACP. 3. Allow it to be fired on their outdoor range as the sound of Auto-fire would lead to a visit by the constabulary.  |
|
|
|
Post by sasquatch on Apr 23, 2007 19:23:08 GMT -5
I tire very quickly of fabricated statistics and emotional arguments paraded as reasoning. BAKKA What possible relevance is a river on the far side of the globe as to whether or not you are a fool? Hypothetically.....I can just picture the re-loaders diving after the empty brass....which would require a lotta work----Thompsons have a nasty habit of chewing up brass with their extractor/ejector setup. |
|
|
|
Post by sasquatch on Apr 24, 2007 8:47:37 GMT -5
the real motives behind gun controlCurrently there is an element who specialize in paper-punching at 400 yards. With the 50 cals this could extend to 1000 yards...perhaps.. Why must all firearms be justified as hunting pieces? Many trap/skeet shooters never hunt.....or are you one of those who fear for the survival of skeet?
|
|
|
|
Post by sasquatch on Apr 24, 2007 14:21:49 GMT -5
The object of that documentary was not to investigate anything but to promote an agenda by portraying things in the worst possible light. Sorta like Al Gore's "inconvenient Truth". You do recall the "FEDUP" rallies on Parliament Hill which were the largest demonstrations in canadian history but the media presented it as about 200-300 ignorant yokels----cameras don't lie? BTW---Who do you want to kill? |
|
|
|
Post by Truthknut on Apr 24, 2007 19:55:55 GMT -5
The object of that documentary was not to investigate anything but to promote an agenda by portraying things in the worst possible light. Sorta like Al Gore's "inconvenient Truth". You do recall the "FEDUP" rallies on Parliament Hill which were the largest demonstrations in canadian history but the media presented it as about 200-300 ignorant yokels----cameras don't lie? BTW---Who do you want to kill? It is amazing to me that although I agree that it MAY be justifiable to own a 50 cal rifle for target shooting you still take offence to the fact that I point out that many of the Rambo Yokels who own these things are total ****ing idiots. This sounds like the NRA point of view which is, not matter how bad a gun owner you are you MUST still be allowed to own a gun because any restriction on any person may start a revolution which would take the toys away from all the kiddies. Bottom line is that with 1/3 of the worlds small arms in the hands of Americans I would bet that only a very small fraction of those are are used for legitimate purposes such as hunting and REAL target shooting. The rest are in the hands of the armed forces and the whackhead Rambo's of that violent country. Rambo's?? Toys? Yokels? I know Teachers, a wildife biologist and women that own firearms. With such uninformed idiots running helter skelter spewing hate because they suffer from a **** envy that secretly places us 'toothless Redneck' sorts on a pedestal it's no wonder C-68 is so unpopular. Moronic stereotypes don't make a factual, intelligent argument its me not you. If you can't use anything but flashy media imagery a la Leni Reifenstal you may wish to find someone to argue with more on your petty level. The USA violent? Ever heard of Jamaica? Mexico? Columbia? Perhaps the generousity of American's in extending their hand and allowing immigration from some of these countries is turning them (and us) into more violent societies. Good thing decent Americans and Canadians can still acquire firearms and keep our societies safe. |
|
|
|
Post by sasquatch on Apr 24, 2007 21:33:28 GMT -5
Yes he does appear to be limited to spewing slogans and reposting ficticious statistics. He likely didn't read that link----perhaps he started then saw himself. He reminds me of the SOW Cukier----who somehow portrays a woman raped and murdered to be somehow morally superior to the woman standing over a dead rapist with a smoking gun. The very notion of self-defence sends these folk into a rage. |
|
|
|
Post by sasquatch on Apr 25, 2007 10:11:11 GMT -5
Oddly enough most of the more inexpensive firearms originate in places like China, Brazil, Argentina, Spain----and always have.... "Son of Sam" used a Brazillian built firearm. Kimver Gil's firearm was not of North american origin. Likely Brazil, Spain or Argentina. |
|
|
|
Post by Truthknut on Apr 25, 2007 11:49:52 GMT -5
Rambo's?? Toys? Yokels? I know Teachers, a wildife biologist and women that own firearms. With such uninformed idiots running helter skelter spewing hate because they suffer from a **** envy that secretly places us 'toothless Redneck' sorts on a pedestal it's no wonder C-68 is so unpopular. ****ic stereotypes don't make a factual, intelligent argument its me not you. If you can't use anything but flashy media imagery a la Leni Reifenstal you may wish to find someone to argue with more on your petty level. The USA violent? Ever heard of Jamaica? Mexico? Columbia? Perhaps the generousity of American's in extending their hand and allowing immigration from some of these countries is turning them (and us) into more violent societies. Good thing decent Americans and Canadians can still acquire firearms and keep our societies safe. Yep I agree when it comes to gun owners in Mexico, Jamaica and Columbia you have guns in the hands of the worst of the worst lunatics. But where did these guns come from ?/ Could it be the huge unrestricted production of guns, in particular the Sat. Night specials which have NO purpose could have come from the the US.. Yeh Yeh I know the europeans and the Commie block produce their share of toys but I would bet the Cheap shoot em dead toys come from the US. And wow,,,you sure know lots of gunslingers. In my shooting days many years ago I knew lots of people who owned restricted weapons ( and I assume we are only talking about that here) but since I sold my toys and turned in my permit I have only met 2 people in Canada in the last 40 years who were owners of these types of toys. Guess if you only move in these circles you would know a disproportionate number of gunslingers. And finally in my previous and current experience with gun owners I have NEVER know any who have bought a gun to keep our society safe. Are you completely nuts You don't really believe that B.S. do you ? In fact I know many owners in the US and they all have their ridiculous reasons for owning guns but I have NEVER heard any of them suggest they bought their toys to protect society. Sounds to me that you truly belong to the idiot fringe of gun owners. Do me a favour, sell your toys cuz I don't need the protection of wing nuts like you. Saturday night specials are illegaly manufactured guns. Not applicable in the context of legal firearms ownership. Guns keeping a society safe? Warsaw Ghetto uprising ring a bell? Limiting absolute State power? "Idiot fringe, toys, wing nuts, gunslingers"? Very nice, name calling. The mark of a skilled debator. Since we are lowering ourselves to this infantile level I will state that a secure western world doesn't need paranoid control freaks like yourself giving governments excessive powers to dominate everyones life. It's the frequency of lunatics like yourself that half to hide their bigotry and ignorance behind a mask of fear that make firearms a necessity for preservation of human dignity. |
|
|
|
Post by Truthknut on Apr 25, 2007 13:52:09 GMT -5
Saturday night specials are illegaly manufactured guns. Not applicable in the context of legal firearms ownership. Guns keeping a society safe? Warsaw Ghetto uprising ring a bell? Limiting absolute State power? "Idiot fringe, toys, wing nuts, gunslingers"? Very nice, name calling. The mark of a skilled debator. Since we are lowering ourselves to this infantile level I will state that a secure western world doesn't need paranoid control freaks like yourself giving governments excessive powers to dominate everyones life. It's the frequency of lunatics like yourself that half to hide their bigotry and ignorance behind a mask of fear that make firearms a necessity for preservation of human dignity. At least I don't claim to be a good and decent north American by acquiring a gun to protect society. Now the B.S. is getting deeper as you claim that firearms are necessary to preserve "Human Dignity". As I said to Sask ,,, you are not really f,,,ing serious are you If you were to read all my posts you would know that in the past I was an owner of restricted weapons and basically enjoyed the hobby. In the end I gave it up because of the cost and a large number of out of control wing nuts who joined the club so I have a very clear idea of what toy ownership is and the mentality of many owners. Maybe you fancy yourself as the saviour of society but I owned guns as the tool of my hobby. PERIOD. I shot guns for fun,, not so God would give me 49 virgins when I passed on to the big playground in the sky. Maybe I missed the point as an owner. Maybe I should I have considered myself as one sent by the big guy in the sky to save all the people and create a decent society My observation is that those who feel the need to save others are very dangerous and I hope the gun control nuts catch up to you before you blow someones brains out. Seeing comments like yours just confirms to me that in Canada we need more investigation into those who want to own restricted weapons. In the case of the US that would be a lost cause as their constitution , in Virginia at least, guarantees that a proven mentally ill person can get a gun to protect Human Dignity and create a wonderful decent society. My goodness isn't it interesting what comes out of the woodwork when the gun issue comes up !!! Virginia tech banned their students from possessing arms on Campus, and the lack of armed resistance just turned out peachy didn't it? I have friends who are active Police officers. They carry guns. Did you know their JOB reqires it? They seem like fine individuals to me. One could say "saviours of society". Where did I say I wish to save others? I wish to live in a society safe from lunatics like yourself. Perhaps it is a very good thing you are unarmed. Here is my quote. You have a rather 3rd Reich way of thinking. Last time no one resisted your ilk, look how many perished. We are much better off with your sort left in a fringe element of society. What a waste of the wonderful gift of freedom of speech. |
|
|
|
Post by sasquatch on Apr 25, 2007 16:21:15 GMT -5
read this pinoy, know yourself You are either very isolated or extremely lucky. I personally have experienced an armed home invasion/robbery recently. The safe storage laws/regs worked out peachy---for the perps. And our on-line registry allowed them to be thorough.
|
|
|
|
Post by Truthknut on Apr 26, 2007 7:42:32 GMT -5
Because you don't, or can't read you assume I am against gun ownership. That is not true and I have explained this many times. Now, if you are visualy disabled why not have a friend read all my other posts slowly so you can process the information. I have no problem with responsible people owning guns and it is obvious to an idiot that cops, security people and military people would carry them. Wake up and read my words: " I don't object to gun ownership by resposible people for recreational purposes. But I dam well do object to anyone who feels the culture in north America is so bad that we need everyone armed to preserve human dignity. This is NOTHING but Bull $hit. Are you nuts ?? In my entire life I have never found the need to have a gun for the preservation my dignity or to preserve my life. In fact I have never know anyone who has ever had a need of a gun for this purpose. Guess we move in different circles. Maybe you should give a little thought to where you go and who you associate with. And finally are you really suggesting as a rational human being that if all the 26000 students on the campus were armed that the tragedy would not have happened. Lets assume you are going to arm all these people,,,who is going to train them in the use of the weapons Give me a break !!! Surely you are just saying this $hit to create posts on this thread. I can honestly believe that there are people that are so silly that they would say such things (like the ****ic gun shop owner who sold the killing weapon to the lunatic) but I would have my doubts that they are capable of turning on a computer let alone use one. See,,,I am giving you credit for having a brain,,why not try to use it rather than talking silly. Where did I say 'give EVERYONE a gun'?? A half dozen armed and trained students could have stopped your friend Cho. Those Americans certainly get you in a tither!! ;D |
|
|
|
Post by sasquatch on Apr 26, 2007 10:33:03 GMT -5
Once again Pinoy64 is diving off the deep end following a script that is getting old. No one recommended ALL students, citizens or other wise to be armed. Everyone is not trustworthy, skilled or comfortable to operate a motor vehicle--so why would anyone assume that in the bearing of arms. The crunch of the matter is this instant, total rejection of the principle of self defense and labeling it as vigilantism, taking the law into your own hands etc. "Shall Carry Laws" have reduced violent crime everywhere it is instituted. 1. Criminals are unsure as to who is capable of fighting back or is capable of intervening. 2.Gun control is based on the ridiculous notion that the Police can protect you, will protect you and even wish to protect you. The Police simply are incapable of being omni-present. A large number of trained, licensed, armed citizens can be more or less omni-present. 3. Incidents of misuse and crime by licensed "shall carry's" is extremely rare apparently. As Canada's wonderful Gun-control apparatus failed with Kimver Gil, this sort of thing will happen----it happens at an alarming rate in Japan which in principle has no firearms in the civil population. Japans strict firearms laws have been in place for generation but when Japan stopped publishing it's stats---it's firearms homicide rate made East LA seem like the Vatican. |
|
|
|
Post by Truthknut on Apr 26, 2007 11:19:14 GMT -5
Where did I say 'give EVERYONE a gun'?? A half dozen armed and trained students could have stopped your friend Cho. Those Americans certainly get you in a tither!! ;D Ok genius,,, who gets to choose the half dozen students who will be trained and armed to protect their friends. And what about the campus police force which is already on staff to address these problems?? And which one of the 100 plus buildings on this campus would you put the highly trained half dozen armed students?? Dam right I am in a tither. With Flicking idiots like you making suggestions we can depend on more and more of this kind of thing happening. What would your attitude be if one of your family members was killed by some mentally ill person who was sold a gun ?? Guess like Regan in the US you would still support the right of mental cases to own guns !! Where did I say I would let YOUR kind have a gun? Whoever qualifies. Who chooses who drives to the Pub? Campus Police? Are they armed? 100 plus buildings? Sounds like Campus Police can't be everywhere. No wonder tuition is so high. Probably why you lack education. Sorry, total lack of security and armament is a much better deterrent???!!!! Do you wear buttless chaps to ward off rapists? |
|
|
|
Post by Truthknut on Apr 26, 2007 12:13:34 GMT -5
Where did I say I would let YOUR kind have a gun? Whoever qualifies. Who chooses who drives to the Pub? Campus Police? Are they armed? 100 plus buildings? Sounds like Campus Police can't be everywhere. No wonder tuition is so high. Probably why you lack education. Sorry, total lack of security and armament is a much better deterrent???!!!! Do you wear buttless chaps to ward off rapists? silly answer.. In my community we depend on the cops for protection. I know of no one who is armed although it I will admit it is possible there are some gun owners in the area. The point here is that if there are such people they do not run around advertising that they are here to provide security to my community because if they did the majority would suggest the gust get the flick out and play in another sandbox. I am beginning to think you are a rather small person who wants to become bigger by telling the world how we will be saved by your guns. Bottom line is we don't want nut bars protecting us. Who said I wanted the responsibility of "saving everyone with my guns"? I just want a safer society with realistic defenses against lunatics like you. I have to move to your community where everyones gets their own personal Cop and I'm safe all the time. I'll let him/her drive me to work and stop for coffee. Are you sure you live on Earth? |
|
|
|
Post by Truthknut on Apr 26, 2007 13:22:52 GMT -5
Who said I wanted the responsibility of "saving everyone with my guns"? I just want a safer society with realistic defenses against lunatics like you. I have to move to your community where everyones gets their own personal Cop and I'm safe all the time. I'll let him/her drive me to work and stop for coffee. Are you sure you live on Earth? Don't know where you live but my community is safe from the boogie men you seem to think exist. When there is a problem the cops take care of the business in the way they were trained to do. I suspect you have no idea how do do the job the cops do. Sure tell me you are an excellent gun handler!! Well we both know that anyone with a hand and 5 finders can point an shoot a gun ( this describes the average gun owner in the USA). This does not mean that they can handle it properly. Interesting how you have not commented on a state like Virgina that allows anyone with a drivers license to get a gun ( even mental patients). You still have not read any of my posts as you would then know I don't have any Flicken problem with toy ownership. I just don't think the majority of people have the brains or capacity to own one and the ones that REALLY flicken worry me are those like you that actually think gun owners do society a service by providing what you think is a deterrent to the big black criminal. This just proves you are not only silly but just plain arrogant. Please go somewhere where the poor little non gun owner will respect your big flicking gun and leave the rest of us to take care of our own problems. Please go where everyone thinks they need a nanny. The University banned guns (legally owned) on Campus, your buddy Cho was free to do his thing. Where were your omnipresent Cops Pindihck?? |
|
|
|
Post by sasquatch on Apr 26, 2007 15:19:38 GMT -5
This Pinoy is real amateurish.... He declares that he is not in favour of banning firearms and then proceeds with page after page of posts advocating/justifying just that with the usual unfounded emotional arguments backed up up by the usual ficticious statistics, produced bt the usual suspects and fantastic experiences......they are fantasies. When I was attacked by armed felons in my own home recently, IN CANADA, it was certainly no fantasy. |
|
|
|
Post by sasquatch on Apr 26, 2007 18:15:32 GMT -5
Well you sure do live in lala land. A buddy who lives in Mississauga was robbed, in his car, of his wallet by a revolver brandishing brigand. This occurred in a busy large well lit parking lot. Here in rural Ontario,(not the GTA) home invasions are far from rare.....urban or rural. Two teams were working Woodstock. One with guns, the other team with baseball bats. The bat team got caught and prosecuted and will be deported back to New York once their sentences are up. This is a standard tactic for your team. Make statements like And ridicule any who has. The SOP in your neighborhood is to likely not be very well acquainted with those who live nearby, hence you would have little or no knowledge of break ins or robberies, unless they were reported by the media. Personally I had heard of daylight break-ins hereabouts but having to confront armed felons was not contemplated. Once a victim, you THEN learn of all the other instances. It does modify your SOP for answering the door.....and I have a much nicer dog.(sarcasm) You think the Police can, will and have to protect you. It ain't gonna happen......About all the police can do is investigate after the felons leave and the felons know this. Meanwhile resources are wasted on a silly long gun registry which would be better applied to putting more boots on the street. Canada wide a pattern has emerged, with regard to home invasions and break ins-----felons, having hacked the on-line registry, are targeting firearms collections. |
|
|
|
Post by sasquatch on Apr 26, 2007 23:23:24 GMT -5
No...........that was your suggestion. Once again you misconstrue. You really have a problem with Americans don't you? Did they refuse you at the border? Really? You are wishing my death? That's not nice. You definitely should not have a firearm....or sharp things. May you get run over by a bus. Not going to get it out dummy....it's out. That's the problemo...they don't give you the time to get it out.... And it's not BIG........just big enough...... Besides I would rather use my khukri. If this hypothetical invader succeeds in dispatching me he will be the first of many to succeed......the rest are pushing up Daisy's far far away..........including the fella who had the khukri.....dummy brought a knife to a gun fight. |
|
|
|
Post by Truthknut on Apr 27, 2007 6:38:47 GMT -5
Well you sure do live in lala land. A buddy who lives in Mississauga was robbed, in his car, of his wallet by a revolver brandishing brigand. This occurred in a busy large well lit parking lot. Here in rural Ontario,(not the GTA) home invasions are far from rare.....urban or rural. Two teams were working Woodstock. One with guns, the other team with baseball bats. The bat team got caught and prosecuted and will be deported back to New York once their sentences are up. This is a standard tactic for your team. Make statements like And ridicule any who has. The SOP in your neighborhood is to likely not be very well acquainted with those who live nearby, hence you would have little or no knowledge of break ins or robberies, unless they were reported by the media. Personally I had heard of daylight break-ins hereabouts but having to confront armed felons was not contemplated. Once a victim, you THEN learn of all the other instances. It does modify your SOP for answering the door.....and I have a much nicer dog.(sarcasm) You think the Police can, will and have to protect you. It ain't gonna happen......About all the police can do is investigate after the felons leave and the felons know this. Meanwhile resources are wasted on a silly long gun registry which would be better applied to putting more boots on the street. Canada wide a pattern has emerged, with regard to home invasions and break ins-----felons, having hacked the on-line registry, are targeting firearms collections. So at the end of the day you are suggesting we all be armed ?? Sounds like a Flicking American to me. My hope is you keep your gun nearby and when some flicking ni... comes into your home with mayhem in mind you get your big toy out, you show it to him and he blows your flicking brains out cuz this is what will happen. Good luck gunny but you won't catch me with one cuz Canada is not that bad yet no matter what your fantasies are. So go get your big toy, curl up on the couch and be careful not to get too much stuff on it while your are fantasizing about the next big KILL !!! Typical fiberal ignoramus. Did you know there are at least 5 other countries in the world other than the US??? Norway for example, has more civilian firearms than Canada, why doesn't Sas sound like a Norwegian?? Typical socially stunted gun control mentality. No clue of what it is to be a Canadian (hunt, trap Hudson Bay, fur trade ring a bell). Firearms are an integral part of our culture and have been for centuries. Perhaps you got off the boat recently and have been feeding at the Turdeaupian trough. Are you an immigrant? You sound like one that just doesn't know our history and culture. Have you heard of the British North AMERICA act? Confederation? Hunting rights of Aboriginals including supply of ammo? If you don't like the gun culture, stay in Torontistan with the other recent immigrants. Perhaps you should purchase an atlas or globe. Look at all the pretty colours. Those are called countries. There are many of them, not just the US and Canada. Perhaps the idea that everything you don't understand must be American will disappear. Hey, what's this one? South Africa? Iwonder if they have any guns for defence or hunting?? |
|
|
|
Post by Truthknut on Apr 27, 2007 10:19:25 GMT -5
Typical fiberal ignoramus. Did you know there are at least 5 other countries in the world other than the US??? Norway for example, has more civilian firearms than Canada, why doesn't Sas sound like a Norwegian?? Typical socially stunted gun control mentality. No clue of what it is to be a Canadian (hunt, trap Hudson Bay, fur trade ring a bell). Firearms are an integral part of our culture and have been for centuries. Perhaps you got off the boat recently and have been feeding at the Turdeaupian trough. Are you an immigrant? You sound like one that just doesn't know our history and culture. Have you heard of the British North AMERICA act? Confederation? Hunting rights of Aboriginals including supply of ammo? If you don't like the gun culture, stay in Torontistan with the other recent immigrants. Perhaps you should purchase an atlas or globe. Look at all the pretty colours. Those are called countries. There are many of them, not just the US and Canada. Perhaps the idea that everything you don't understand must be American will disappear. Hey, what's this one? South Africa? Iwonder if they have any guns for defence or hunting?? More flicking nonsense. Again Can you flicking read ?? If you could you would know that I am NOT ANTIGUN and NOT Pro GUN CONTROL as you perceive it. I am however against mental patients owning guns and for a systems which would evaluate the suitability of any person to own a gun. I am sure however you would object to such a system as you would be banned from ever owning a firearm. Your true colors are really showing through. You are not just a Flicking gun nut you are also a flicking racists. What do "Recent Immigrants " have to do with guns?? Aside from you're difficulty with the English language, here's my quote again. BTW, immigrants aren't a 'race'!!!!! Too bad ignorance doesn't ban one from access to the internet. You're getting bent out of shape, using pseodo-profanities like " flicking", equating gun ownership to being American and the very fact we're having this discussion demonstrates otherwise. You were the one who went on the delusional and paranoid rant about gun owners. I believe you even refered to phallus size having a bearing on ones interest in firearms. You seem to equate firearms to ones genitalia. A rather disingenious metaphor. The shrinks would have a hey day on you, Pinprick. We should come to your house and confiscate all your sharp objects??? "The gun nuts are out to get me!!!" Where's my tinfoil hat??? |
|
|
|
Post by Truthknut on Apr 27, 2007 11:45:22 GMT -5
Aside from you're difficulty with the English language, here's my quote again. BTW, immigrants aren't a 'race'!!!!! Too bad ignorance doesn't ban one from access to the internet. You're getting bent out of shape, using pseodo-profanities like " flicking", equating gun ownership to being American and the very fact we're having this discussion demonstrates otherwise. You were the one who went on the delusional and paranoid rant about gun owners. I believe you even refered to phallus size having a bearing on ones interest in firearms. You seem to equate firearms to ones genitalia. A rather disingenious metaphor. The shrinks would have a hey day on you, Pinprick. We should come to your house and confiscate all your sharp objects??? "The gun nuts are out to get me!!!" Where's my tinfoil hat??? silly response. Why not go out in your back yard,,,blow off a few100 rounds of your favorite ammo to clear you head then come back and post something with meaning. You've outdone yourself this time!! Nothing better to respond to a silly response than post an even sillier one. Why don't you stand in front of a full length mirror fretting over the size over your 'obsession' to clear your head then come back and post something with meaning? Amazing how trite your responses get when you have no logical argument to stand on. |
|
|
|
Post by sasquatch on Apr 27, 2007 16:14:46 GMT -5
This Pinoy person is a mystery. He has both feet planted firmly on the ground as far as AGW and the BS that surrounds it and then levitates like tinkerbell, plants both feet firmly in the air, and spews all this nonsence. This is not about so-called gun-control (guns have wheels) but about self defence. |
|
|
|
Post by sasquatch on Apr 28, 2007 11:13:47 GMT -5
This boils down to an aversion to attempt to control dangerous behavior by people and instead attempt to effect safety by banning inanimate objects.
C68 has not provided safety but has instead emboldened criminals by creating unarmed victims and a data-base for robbery.
Prohibition of Alcohol was a failure although the "Ride Programme" has without doubt reduced DUI---but not eliminated it.
Random drug tests have reduced drug use in commercial drivers to almost NIL.
Graduated licenses, and restrictions on young drivers however have not eliminated street racing.....no government is even contemplating banning powerful "muscle cars" or super bikes. The only restraint on super cars and super bikes is the problem of finding and affording insurance.
However, this does not mean we abandon side guard beams, bicycle helmets, seat belts or air bags.
|
|
|
|
Post by Truthknut on Apr 28, 2007 16:55:31 GMT -5
This Pinoy person is a mystery. He has both feet planted firmly on the ground as far as AGW and the BS that surrounds it and then levitates like tinkerbell, plants both feet firmly in the air, and spews all this nonsence. This is not about so-called gun-control (guns have wheels) but about self defence. ... Whether you own a restricted weapon for hobby or protection that's find with me. My point has always been we have to prevent the wing nuts and mental patients from owning these things. Nothing more nothing less. If others would read my posts that would be quite evedent but just cannot resist poking at those who think everyone is out to take their toys away. Your tone indicates you do not. When the debate exposes pertinent facts you respond with bile about "clearing my head by discharging ammunition. Let's recap. You accuse me of a mental imbalance. I point out your affixation with firearms as a phallic symbol. Rudimentary freudean psychoanalysis, and you fall short. Your response "blow off ammo, clear my head.............." Perhaps you are psychologically balanced, however, intellectually you are found wanting. This obsession with American law and culture, while you do not live in the USA indicates a disturbing desire to control others. Not a person I would empower with a fine quality firearm or political leverage. "Clearing my head" was also your prescription for my assertion that immigrants are not a race. Simple concept really. Would I be a racist for disliking an immigrant from my ethnic makeup also?? My prescription for you is a healthy study of Canadian culture and history. We have always been a Nation with a strong Gun Culture. Perhaps my head is not clear from lack of blowing off rounds but my insistence that we have a strong history of hunting, trapping and fishing seems quite plausible considering the presence of the Hudson Bay Company to this day. Now, before you respond I'll give you a couple days to contemplate a more intelligent response. It must be embarrassing to "get owned" by a toothless, redneck, macho hillbilly type!!! "Blow off ammo to clear my head", Ha ha!!! I haven't heard such wit since Grade 3 with "I know you are but what am I"!!!!! |
|
|
|
Post by Truthknut on Apr 30, 2007 6:54:35 GMT -5
No's all around. I support 'choice' though. We don't have a gun culture??? Once again, HUNTING SEASON? It's not all American tourists. Dominion of Canada Rifle Association??? We used to have .22 ranges in school basements. Boy Scouts used .22's. Ever been out of the city since you immigrated??? BTW, congrats, you have matured greatly in this last post. |
|
|
|
Post by Truthknut on Apr 30, 2007 9:27:39 GMT -5
No's all around. I support 'choice' though. We don't have a gun culture??? Once again, HUNTING SEASON? It's not all American tourists. Dominion of Canada Rifle Association??? We used to have .22 ranges in school basements. Boy Scouts used .22's. Ever been out of the city since you immigrated??? BTW, congrats, you have matured greatly in this last post. My goodness I sure hope responsible gun owners tell you to Flick Off cuz if I were still one I would not want a person like you speaking for me,,, especially if you don't own a gun. What Flicking right do you have to speak for a hobby and sport you have ZERO understanding about? Sounds like the POPE. This old fart has never had sex yet he professes to know all about it. Hunting is a culture ?? Where did you come from ?? Hunting is a sport and I have never met a hunter who ran around like Rambo trying to show all the Boys and Girls how big a guy he was just because he had a gun. The vast majority of these sportsmen are responsible owners and don't need spokespeople like you screwing up their image. How do yu get this... out of this YOu have based your entire oinion (bias) on the image of Rambo. How can I screw up their image when no matter what I say all you can comprehend is Rambo??? Perhaps you should lay off on the American movies. I can't help your obsessions. Assume what you will. Speaking of obsession. If I showed you varous ink blots (aka Rorshach test) would you answer Rambo or violence to every one? Let's keep our debate grounded in reality, not Hollywood imagery. If hunting isn't a culture why does Ontario protect hunting with something called the Hunting and fishing HERITAGE act? www.mnr.gov.on.ca/mnr/csb/news/nov19fs01.html |
|
|
|
Post by Truthknut on Apr 30, 2007 12:10:22 GMT -5
How do yu get this... out of this YOu have based your entire oinion (bias) on the image of Rambo. How can I screw up their image when no matter what I say all you can comprehend is Rambo??? Perhaps you should lay off on the American movies. I can't help your obsessions. Assume what you will. Speaking of obsession. If I showed you varous ink blots (aka Rorshach test) would you answer Rambo or violence to every one? Let's keep our debate grounded in reality, not Hollywood imagery. If hunting isn't a culture why does Ontario protect hunting with something called the Hunting and fishing HERITAGE act? www.mnr.gov.on.ca/mnr/csb/news/nov19fs01.html I can only conclude that you would not be allowed to own one because 1. You are too young 2. You would not be acceptabel under the rules. in the end tow good reason to terminate this silly debate. Are you a total idiot?? Is English your second language? Here were your questions: I own only long guns. Pistols are too inaccurate for my tastes. Looks like you don't have the attention span to pass the test!!!! |
|
|
|
Post by Truthknut on Apr 30, 2007 13:34:33 GMT -5
Are you a total idiot?? Is English your second language? Here were your questions: I own only long guns. Pistols are too inaccurate for my tastes. Looks like you don't have the attention span to pass the test!!!! Handguns are too inaccurate for your taste?? I would just bet that you simply do not have the talent to make one perform with accuracy. I have some crazy American friends who ONLY hunt with handguns. I say crazy because I cannot imagine the talent and guts it would take to go out into the forests in Alaska and hunt big game no matter how big your hadngun was. But at the end of the hunt they return with their kill so I guess they must be pretty good. Oh well, some people just take the easy way out. That's probably true. I prefer trap and skeet as well.' I must say though, to argue about my handgun skills would be a little "redneck, Rambo macho" wouldn't it? |
|
